Subjective grades – objective problems: Why ratings in climbing gyms are more than just numbers

Presentation by Christopher Igel, Alexandra Schweikart, Routenbauzentrale
Friday 11/21/2025
11:15 am - 11:45 am
Foyer Ost
Stage
German
English

Climbing grades are intended to provide guidance – they should motivate, challenge and also warn of difficulties. But in reality, they are often a source of frustration, discussion and misunderstanding. This is because ratings are never neutral. They reflect not only difficulty, but also expectations, norms – and ‘climbing hall politics’.

In this lecture, we take a look at the origins and significance of difficulty grades – and how they influence our climbing experience. How are ratings actually created? Why are they so crucial for the sport and for us as climbers? A single grade represents more than just a numerical code: fun, self-confidence, belonging – and yes, even the economic success of a climbing gym.

We show why ratings can never be completely objective and how they have historically been shaped by normative ideas about the body. What impact does it have on us when a route is rated differently depending on the assessment? Which grading systems are currently used in your gyms? We show why fair, transparent and advanced grading systems are not just nice to have, but essential – for motivation, for inclusion and for real climbing fun.

Because one thing is clear – research and our own experience show: grades matter.

Speaker: Christopher Igel, Routenbauzentrale

Presentation, Climbing & bouldering

You might also be interested in

Routesetting Roundtable
Interactive discussion among colleagues about challenges, experiences and best practices Examples with Peter Zeidelhack and Julius Kerscher
DAV bouldering certificate for children and young people
A two-stage 'Indoor Boulder Check' presented by Julia Dörffel
Is everything organised for the rescue by rope?
Panel discussion - Moderator: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Marco Einhaus, TU München